You can also research the company to learn more about its culture, values and mission. For example, the hiring manager may explicitly state they're seeking self-motivated candidates or use similar phrases, such as individuals who are self-starters or can work independently.Īs you review the job description, take notes about the qualifications mentioned by the employer to determine whether you meet them. It also defines the qualities, skills and other qualifications sought in candidates. The job description provides insights into the role and its typical tasks and responsibilities, potentially including details about the team or organization itself. Review the job descriptionīefore drafting your resume, read the job description carefully to ensure you understand the hiring manager's expectations for candidates. Use the following tips as guidance for demonstrating self-motivation on your resume: 1. How to show that you're self-motivated on your resume When the job description asks for self-motivated candidates, emphasizing this quality in your resume can help prove you're right for the job. Your resume serves as a potential employer's introduction to who you are. Self-motivated employees can also lead a good example for their colleagues, inspiring them to work harder. This quality can also prove your drive as an employee, meaning that you may strive to not only meet your team's expectations but to exceed them. When employers seek self-motivated candidates, they want to ensure that they can trust you to start and complete tasks without reminders or additional pressure from your supervisors. It's important to show that you're self-motivated on your resume because it demonstrates your ability to work independently. 19, 2021).Why is it important to show that you're self-motivated on your resume? § 21-6811(a) (2017) (explaining the process for calculating criminal history, including the fact that three prior misdemeanors are calculated as one prior person felony). § 21-6814 (2020) (explaining the process for establishing criminal history, challenging criminal history, and the burden shifting when a challenge is made). Therefore, constitutional challenges to criminal history not made at or before initial sentencing hearings, even those raised on direct appeal, shift the burden to the defendant to prove any disputes. Since, however, Roberts’s challenge was not at his initial sentencing, the burden shifting of § 21-6814(c) required him-and not the State-to prove the disputed portions. Roberts did not challenge his prior convictions at the initial sentencing, but did raise a challenge on direct appeal. If the defendant does not do so, but later challenges their prior convictions, the burden is on the defendant to prove the disputed portions of the criminal history report. If the defendant gives written notice and the exact nature of an error at or before the initial sentencing hearing, the State must prove any disputed portions of the criminal history report. The State meets its initial burden by providing a summary of the offender’s criminal history prepared for the court. § 21-6814 provides a burden shifting test for proving prior criminal history. Roberts argued that because his challenge came on direct appeal, and not on a later appeal, the State still had the burden to prove the disputed portions of his criminal history.ĭiscussion: K.S.A. Then, on direct appeal, he challenged the constitutionality of his misdemeanor convictions based on the State’s failure to prove that he was represented or waived his right to representation. At sentencing, Roberts admitted to the prior convictions. § 21-6811(a) to count Roberts’s three prior misdemeanor convictions as one person felony conviction for his criminal history score. The government no longer has the burden of proof if the defendant first challenges their prior convictions during the direct appeal.įacts: Roberts pled guilty to possession of various illegal substances and criminal possession of a firearm. If a defendant fails to challenge their prior convictions at the initial hearing, but does so on direct appeal of the sentencing, does the government still have the burden of proof?Īnswer: No. § 21-6814(c), when a defendant challenges the constitutionality of their prior convictions at or before their initial sentencing hearing, the State has the burden of proving any disputed portions of the defendant’s criminal history. Updated on NovemChallenging Prior Convictions in Kansas Sentencing: Who Has the Burden, and When?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |